MEMORABLE TV MOMENTS?

posted to Cue Sheet by James Reel

From the Associated Press:

The most memorable moments in television history will be revealed during the 60th Primetime Emmy Awards next month, and it's up to voters to decide which bits should take top honors. Forty “moments”—20 dramatic and 20 comedic—are in the running. Comedy contenders include _M-A-S-H_, _Mork & Mindy_, _Sex and the City_ and _The Cosby Show_, while _Buffy the Vampire Slayer_, _Miami Vice_, _Moonlighting_ and _The Sopranos_ are among the drama candidates. … Fans can watch clips and vote for their favorite moments online until Sept. 15. The top five vote-getters in each category will be presented during the Emmy show on Sept. 21, and the two winning moments will be revealed just before the year's outstanding drama and comedy series are named.

You can vote for the comedy nominees here, and the drama contenders here.

I stopped watching TV on a regular basis in the late 1970s, but it was a constant, nattering presence in my childhood and every couple of years I do catch up with some series on DVD (my current project is Battlestar Galactica. So I was curious about the nominees.

And disappointed. I didn’t watch all the clips, but I’m not sure that even those from shows I have watched really constitute “most memorable moments.”

Let’s look first at the comedy category. First, the clip from M-A-S-H doesn’t belong there. Yes, Radar’s announcement that Henry’s plane had gone down en route home was certainly a memorable scene, but it was a dramatic scene, not a comedic one. (It was one of the big turning points in the tone of the series, as it evolved from a wisecracking comedy to a humorous drama.) It’s what semanticists would call a category error.

So what about the clips that are there? I skipped the shows I never or rarely watched (about half of them) and sampled only those that I knew I had sympathy for. Even so, I wasn’t impressed. The minute-and-a-half from The Honeymooners is just a slow-paced buildup to a very obvious punchline (about “addressing the ball” in a golf lesson). The final scene from Newhart, in which Bob wakes up in the bedroom of his previous series and realizes that the entire series he’s now ending has been a dream, is a fine joke, but it ends with a very weak line about Japanese food. Richard Nixon saying “Sock it to me?” on Laugh-In was a remarkable coup for both the show and Nixon, but I’m not sure that three seconds of comic incongruity equals greatness. Somehow I’d never seen the Mary Tyler Moore episode in which they memorialize a dead clown, supposedly one of the funniest things in TV history, and now judging from the clip I just don’t find it all that funny; the set-up is too obvious, and the lines just aren’t as zany as they need to be. The Carol Burnett Gone with the Wind parody is, on the other hand, a model of TV sketch comedy and includes a priceless joke about the heroine’s dress, but I wonder what makes this more memorable than any other snippet from that series?

There are problems in the drama category, too. I never watched Little House on the Prairie, but clicked its clip out of curiosity. Pa is telling one of his daughters that she is slowly going blind in a scene notable for effective, long pauses in the very simple dialog, but the effect is spoiled by melodramatic music at the end. James Caan’s mumbled hospital scene from Brian’s Song is not, in my opinion, the most memorable moment from that old made-for-TV movie; I’d prefer Billy Dee Williams’ little speech toward the end (although I haven’t seen it in about 35 years, and it might not be as effective as I recall). The moment in Buffy the Vampire Slayer jumps to her death (only for her to be resurrected in the next season) was excellent in the context of the series, but frankly it wasn’t the best example of Joss Whedon’s writing for that show, and the little post-apocalyptic scene of mourning that followed this one was more moving, and, besides, I can think of a lot of “memorable moments” from the series that were better than this. The X-Files snippet, in which Mulder and Scully finally kiss, was cathartic for the characters and fans of the series, but frankly the scene isn’t as well-written as it could have been. Of the clips I watched, the only one I felt was worth voting for was from the famous “City on the Edge of Forever” episode of Star Trek. There are no 23rd-century aliens and spaceships here, just an intense scene in which Kirk and Spock are reunited with a formerly deranged Dr. McCoy in the 1930s, and in order to prevent history from being changed by their presence, Kirk prevents McCoy from saving the life of a woman with whom Kirk has fallen in what for him passes for love. It’s an emotionally complex scene of reunion and death and motivations that the characters themselves don’t fully understand, and it holds up very well on its own.

Surely there are other scenes of this caliber in the 60-year history of television. Why weren’t they submitted for voting?

AZPM PROGRAMMING NOTE

posted to Rappaport's Notebook by Robert Rappaport

KUAT6 will air live coverage of the political conventions beginning next week, meaning Arizona Illustrated is going on hiatus beginning Monday, but there's more..

When the show returns September 8 at 6:30 p.m., it will have a new look (HD) and a new format. Here's a snippet of the AZPM news release that just went out to our colleagues in the local media.

“The new Arizona Illustrated will give a fresh perspective on news in Southern Arizona,” said Jack Gibson, Director and General Manager of Arizona Public Media. “We will keep all the best of the existing show – the ‘Friday Roundtable’ and thorough coverage of news of interest to the local community with our ‘In Focus’ segments. The new show will now respond to our viewers with a segment called “Letters” and fresh emphasis on local music, sports, and special video segments from our creative videographers.”

As of this writing, the new set is still being constructed, as are the new graphics and music. Let's hope it all goes according to schedule.

RHEINBERGER SUITES

posted to Cue Sheet by James Reel

RHEINBERGER Suite for Violin and Organ, op. 166. Pieces for Cello and Organ, Op. 150. Suite for Violin, Cello, and Organ, op. 149 • Melina Mandozzi (vn); Orfeo Mandozzi (vc); Hannfried Lucke (org) • CARUS 83.411 (Hybrid multichannel SACD: 73:25)

Rheinberger’s Op. 150 pieces for cello and organ are actually arrangements extracted from a suite for violin and organ. The original version, in its entirety, is coupled with the Op. 149 suite for violin, cello, and organ on Helios and Cantate; it’s coupled with the Op. 166 suite for violin and organ on Naxos. Each of those discs received benign notice in previous issues of Fanfare, as did Op. 166 when coupled with Rheinberger’s organ concertos on Capriccio (that review was by me). My colleagues and I tend to respond to this music fairly positively, while noting that it won’t knock you over in originality or panache.

Apparently in the 1880s there was some demand for music for solo strings backed by the Romantic organ as a full partner, even if it had to be reined in so as not to cover the violin or cello. Rheinberger offered rich, luscious music with a limited emotional range, sounding rather like German Fauré (although, in truth, Fauré was capable of greater passion than this). It’s exceptionally pleasant music, its forward-moving melodies looking forward somewhat to the more understated passages in the works of Franz Schmidt.

I’ll compare the playing and ound here only to the Capriccio disc, which is also a hybrid multichannel SACD. Here, the perspective is more distant than in the Capriccio recording, and Melina Mandozzi is more likely than Capriccio’s Ernö Sebestyen to spin out a long line; Sebestyen is more declamatory, and tied to shorter phrases. Cellist Orfeo Mandozzi, apparently Melina’s brother, follows the family lead, and organist Hannfried Lucke is every bit as satisfactory here as is Andreas Juffinger on Capriccio.

This is worth exploring, especially for string fanciers, if you don’t require music that inspires a strong, visceral response from the listener. James Reel

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TUCSON!

posted to Rappaport's Notebook by Robert Rappaport

Wednesday is Tucson's 233rd birthday, so let's all give a shout out to our own community.

To help celebrate the day, the City of Tucson has plenty of activities planned, including a raising of all the flags that have flow over Tucson and, of course, a big birthday cake.

From the city's website:

"Tucson's birthday is an opportunity to celebrate our unique history and culture. The achievements of previous generations are many. We stand in their footsteps, and we recognize their leadership and stewardship which has transformed this beautiful land into this great desert city,” said Tucson Mayor Robert Walkup. “I respectfully ask my fellow Tucsonans to join with me on this 233rd birthday in honoring our past while at the same time remembering the duty we share with past generations to make Tucson an even better place for our children and grandchildren.”

"The Pimería Alta has always been a crossroads for different cultural groups. It is appropriate that the wide array of birthday events in this community reflects that diversity and rich cultural history," said Richard Elías, Chairman of the Pima County Board of Supervisors and President of Los Descendientes Del Presidio de Tucson. "In the spirit of community and a shared history, we should recognize that all of us are descendents of the presidio."

Here's a list of all the activities.

MAGAZINE DECLINE

posted to Rappaport's Notebook by Robert Rappaport

Have you bought a magazine lately? If not, you're not alone. It appears the economy has crippled yet another industry.

I was about to blog about a recent study on the magazine's decline, but I see James Reel beat me to it last Friday on his Cue Sheet blog, so just go ahead and read that.

THE POST OFFICE IS KILLING OUR MAGAZINES

posted to Cue Sheet by James Reel

Magazines are in financial trouble, and part of the situation—but only part of it—is described in an Associated Press article that includes this information:

Newsstand sales of U.S. magazines fell 6.3 percent in the first half of 2008, an industry group said Monday, as rising gas and food costs led consumers to cut back on nonessential spending. … Publishers redouble efforts to sign up subscribers during economic slowdowns because they know newsstand sales will ebb, which they need to offset because advertising rates are based on minimum circulation targets. Newsstand sales are far more lucrative than subscriptions, though, meaning circulation revenue is dropping at most titles. … Overall magazine circulation, which includes subscription and newsstand sales, was flat at 349.9 million copies in the period, as paid subscriptions edged higher to 290.2 million copies, the Audit Bureau of Circulations reported in its biannual tally. Single-copy magazine sales in the six months ended June 30 fell to 44.1 million copies from 47.1 million a year ago. The survey included 467 titles that reported results in both periods.

Single-copy sales are a problem, but there’s also an insidious threat to subscription copies: the U.S. Postal Service. Here’s part of an e-mail that Joel Flegler, editor and publisher of Fanfare, sent to his staff (including me) last weekend:

Originally I had intended to publish a 500+page Nov/Dec issue, but I discovered a few weeks ago that the USPS recently instituted a ruling that a magazine won't qualify for bulk rate mailing if it exceeds 3/4". If it's over the limit, it means that I would have to mail each copy as a parcel, which would be prohibitively expensive, at least $10,000 more per issue. After discussing the situation with Fanfare's printer, who investigated the various types of paper that we could use and still maintain quality, it's now clear that Fanfare can never exceed 416 pages unless the USPS changes its requirements. (There have been numerous articles published about how the USPS seems determined to drive small publishers out of business. The apparently annual increase for mailings is bad enough, but service is also deteriorating at an alarming rate, with subscriber copies often arriving three or four weeks late as well as many copies being lost in the mail.) Because of the significantly larger-than-average number of reviews for the Nov/Dec issue and the unexpected restriction on the size I can publish, I have to face the regrettable decision of postponing many reviews until the Jan/Feb issue. This will certainly have an impact on the quantity of new releases that I'll be assigning for the Oct. 1 deadline.

Bad service from the post office, and from the distributors that provide magazines to bookstores, is perhaps as great a danger to American magazines as any other, more widely discussed factor.