Arizona Public Media
Schedules
AZPM on Facebook AZPM on Twitter AZPM on YouTube AZPM on Google+ AZPM on Instagram

Cue Sheet – October 2006

COPLLAPSING TOWER

    The bankruptcy of Tower Records will have absolutely no impact in Tucson, aside from those few people who order from it online (and they can easily switch to a variety of other music sellers). Tower never established a store here, despite rumors of imminent arrival that had local shop owners (remember them) worried in the 1980s and ’90s. I’m not sure what all the fuss is about; the last time I was in New York, I killed some time by browsing in the classical department at Tower, and didn’t find a single thing I wanted to buy. (I did, however, later emerge from the Metropolitan Opera giftshop with a plump bag of recorded goodies, and I’m not even an opera maniac.)
    Still, the debacle is interesting as a symbol of the collapse of the old order. David Hurwitz has penned a typically cranky editorial on the subject:

The final, ignominious demise of Tower Records, auctioned off in bankruptcy to a liquidator for about $146 million, couldn’t have come quickly enough. For years this dinosaur has acted as a break on the necessary restructuring of the retail sector, the musical equivalent of an acute intestinal blockage. The end was predictable, indeed expected for a decade or more, and the only thing keeping the ship afloat was the support of major labels desperate to justify their expensive and proprietary nationwide distribution networks (for popular music, primarily). No one, not Tower, not the labels, was making money; indeed, between Tower paying its bills in returned product, and labels routinely agreeing to payment terms that amounted basically to a barter or consignment arrangement, the only outfit profiting over the past several years has been UPS and other package delivery services.
    Hurwitz is actually optimistic about the post-Tower future of classical record sales. You can find out why here.

Classical Music,

REVIEW: TUCSON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA/GEORGE HANSON

    Over the weekend, I learned that two married friends of mine, people who don’t often go to classical concerts, had attended the Tucson Symphony’s program on Friday night, the same night I went. “We looked at each other,” said the husband, “and said, ‘When did Tucson get such a good orchestra?’”
    Indeed, the TSO’s performance of Beethoven and Mahler under conductor George Hanson was quite strong and in many ways even impressive, although that would not surprise anybody who attends concerts more regularly. So many things about the performance were so right that I feel a little ungrateful wishing there’d been an additional dimension to the concert: a more surprising, more personal view of the music.
    Don’t get me wrong; there wasn’t anything dull or routine about the playing. In Beethoven’s Symphony No. 1, phrasing was nicely pointed, tempos seemed just, and the woodwinds had good presence, easily holding their own against the reduced string ensemble (8-8-6-4-2, which would be almost doubled for the Mahler to come). The drawback to using a modest, Beethoven-sized complement in the 2,200-seat TCC Music Hall is that the string sound becomes a bit diffused, as it did Friday.
    Furthermore, Hanson had significantly rearranged the orchestra, dividing the violins left and right, spreading the basses across the back just in front of the percussion on the top level of what look like new risers, and pulling everything to the lip of the stage. Moving the orchestra forward would help the TSO generate a hall-filling roar during the Mahler with improved clarity, and dividing the violins is almost always a good idea in anything. But there’s a problem specific to the TCC Music Hall: Anything downstage, stage left, must struggle to be heard. Usually it’s the cellos that saw away to little audible effect, but now it’s the second violins that suffer. Friday night they sounded fine when playing on their own, as at the beginning of the second movement in the Beethoven, but they completely disappeared into tutti passages. There’s not much Hanson and his players can do about this, short of hiring a wrecking ball, tearing down the hall and starting over.
    That balance issue aside, the performance was secure and efficient, but it didn’t display much character beyond what naturally springs from the page. That’s a good start, not to be discounted—too many dull or inattentive performers seem to do their best to stifle Beethoven’s natural character—but with Beethoven performances as plentiful as they are, it would be nice for Hanson to set his interpretation apart somehow.
    The Beethoven symphony was offered as a classical balance to Mahler’s hyper-romantic Symphony No. 5, but it was a missed programming opportunity. Mahler was a noted conductor as well as a composer, and he took it upon himself to “retouch” many scores by his forebears to make them more effective for his contemporary orchestra. I don’t think he messed with Beethoven’s First, but he did expand Beethoven’s Op. 95 string quartet and all of Schumann’s symphonies, the first or fourth of which would have fit comfortably onto this program in place of the Beethoven First. This would have given us a broader picture of Mahler’s artistry, while still providing the necessary stylistic contrast.
    The bulk of the concert shifted to the second part, devoted to Mahler’s Symphony No. 5; it’s almost three times as long as the Beethoven, though hardly a note is superfluous. Hanson is a very effective Mahler conductor, and this performance of the Fifth brought clarity to the music’s structure without downplaying its sonic and emotional effects. The first movement is very nearly a trumpet concerto, the solos played superbly by Ed Reid. Hanson and the orchestra brought a confident, almost imperceptible swagger to the funeral-march theme, and later played the famous Adagietto at a gently flowing tempo, not lugubriously as used to be common. In this movement Hanson made good use of modest rubato, usually drawing out ascending figures for extra expression.
    The entire performance was well balanced, from the loudest to the softest extremes, and took Mahler’s emotional outpourings seriously. Still, I kept wishing for just a little bit more—more indulgent portamento from the strings, a heightened sense of angst and neurosis. But there are more good ways than one to play Mahler, and it isn’t entirely fair of me to fault Hanson for not doing it my way when he and the orchestra put across his own slightly more reserved interpretation so effectively.

Classical Music,

TSO WEB SITE, CONTINUED

    Last time, you may recall, former Tucson Symphony employee Jan Crews criticized Drew McManus' low ranking of the TSO's cyberspace presence in his annual survey of orchestras' Web sites. You might want to go here to review Jan's comments, with links to the original material, because now Drew has sent me this response:

    Although I’m always disappointed to see orchestra administrators become upset with their rating in the annual website review, I’m happy to say that I can count the number of organizations that expressed a level of displeasure similar to that which Jan expressed on one hand. In fact, many organizations that received lower scores in previous years have successfully used the review as tangible evidence in convincing their executives that the organization needs to direct increased resources to this important point of contact with their patrons. And among a number of groups, the results have been fantastic.
     Orchestra staffers and middle managers are underpaid and overworked, but we all decide to do the work we do for the reasons we feel justify the experience. At the same time, I can understand why these pressures can make those responsible for their organization’s website upset with a low score; however, I think it would be useful to point out a few things based on Jan’s comments.
     First, the review is designed to allow smaller budget ensembles to perform on an even playing field compared to their large budget peers. In fact, there were several organizations with budgets that are comparable or even much less than Tucson’s which scored much higher and there were larger budget originations which scored lower.
     For example, the Milwaukee Symphony, an organization with a budget more than three times the size of Tucson, finished one place lower than Tucson. However, the Las Vegas Philharmonic and the Colorado Springs Philharmonic both have budgets that are half that of Tucson but they scored much higher.
     It’s worth noting that both the organizations in Las Vegas and Colorado Springs scored lower than Tucson in the 2005 review but managed to improve their sites enough to score higher in the 2006 review, all while continuing to have an annual budget that is half that of the TSO.
     Next, I wanted to point that that the TSO was notified about the review. All communication was sent to sdebenedette@tucsonsymphony.org, who received a copy of the same messages that were sent to every orchestra in the review. Those included email notices about the review survey, the reminder as the survey deadline approached, the review launch, and a notice about the special recognition awards article. I’m sorry Jan felt slighted that I didn’t contact her directly but it is standard policy to contact the official press representative for an ensemble when delivering announcements or requesting information.
     Finally, I would challenge Jan’s notion that improving their website would not lead to improved revenue. In fact, the experiences from peer ensembles demonstrate otherwise. A number of ensembles reported increased ticket sales and donations as a result of improvements they made to their websites following previous reviews. You can find that information in the material the respective organizations provided via their website review survey.
     I hope this helps Jan and the rest of the TSO staff see how they can take advantage of what the review offers. And in response to Jan’s criticisms, the reviews are not designed to be heavy handed, rather, they are honest evaluations conducted across an even playing field. Everyone that views the results will notice that big budget organizations such as the L.A. Philharmonic received low scores right along with the TSO. Furthermore, I do offer a great deal of pro bono advice and assistance every year to ensembles on a variety of issues, including that of website development. One example of this was following the 2006 review, I was happy to assist the LA. Chamber Orchestra with issues related to improving their online security.
     When we reached a point where I couldn’t spend any more time with the organization in good faith without being compensated for my services, I directed them to contact some other orchestras that I was aware of which had gone through similar issues they were experiencing. I also indicated that they may want to investigate technology grants that would allow them to direct increased resources into developing their website. This way, if they decided to employ my services as a consultant they could but at the same time, they had options available to them which would cost nothing and hopefully provide them with the information they needed to adequately complete their task.
     Another aspect of the reviews is the fact that they are published free of charge and without registration. Furthermore, they are available to anyone with access to the internet. Neither I nor any of the other bloggers at Arts Journal are compensated for the time and effort we put into our respective columns so there is no monetary gain on my end for the enormous amount of time involved with producing the reviews. The reviews exist as a service to the entire field that allows ensembles to see how they compare to their peers and to help identify components of their website which are strong and those which could use improvement. To this date, there is no other resources, free or pay, that offers this much assistance.
     Additionally, each organization will determine the value they place on their website and how it functions as a point of contact with their audience. My experience dictates that it is an extraordinarily valuable resource and will continue to grow in value as more and more potential patrons become accustomed to gathering their information from online sources.
     In the end, the internet is a much less expensive option for reaching out to an audience and staying connected with them as opposed to traditional marketing methods. All of the orchestras that score high in the review are proof to that as they continue to use their website to help lower per-ticket marketing costs and increase annual fund donations. As such, the amount of resources an organization directs toward their website is a choice, not a constraint.

tucson-arts,

MY WEEKLY READER

    With Thursday comes my appearance in the Tucson Weekly. Two stories this time. First, anaother in what looks like it’s becoming a weekly series on local gay theater:

    Eugenia Woods is producing four new plays in a single weekend, but she's not thinking of the project as merely a theater event.
    "This is a chance for the community to come together and expose themselves to stories that will give them a sense of the real issues that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender families in our community face," she says.
    The key word in that sentence is "families." Woods' Stark Naked Productions is presenting First Words: Relativity, a festival of plays all about "the strengths and challenges of LGBT family life."
    And importantly to Woods, those families extend well beyond a couple setting up housekeeping together.
    "Some people may have been estranged from their family of origin, and they've had to be very creative in forming families of their own," she says. Families wind up including lovers, friends, adopted kids, and parents and siblings at varying levels of acceptance of LGBT life.
    Families are tremendously important, regardless of one's sexual orientation, Woods asserts. "It's a wild world, and without that unconditional support, that faith other people have in who you are authentically as a human being, we will be manipulated by fear-driven and commercially driven dictates. I rely on my family to mirror my own truth to me, and accept that truth, regardless of whether it's comfortable for them."
    You can read the whole story here, but be patient; pages are taking ridiculously long to download today.
    I also have a review of Tartuffe at the University of Arizona, in a limber translation by the UA’s own Harold Dixon. The important sentence: “The UA's Arizona Repertory Theatre has mounted a winning production of the classic, its only little flaw being a tendency to argue too hard for the story's pertinence.” Find out more here.

tucson-arts,

VAPORWRATH

    Computer freaks sometimes use the term “vaporware” to refer to software that some company like Microsoft announces with much ballyhoo but never gets around to actually releasing. Maybe we should apply the term “vaporwrath” to indignation and denunciation based on complete ignorance of something that has offended in absentia.
    Consider violinist Ilkka Talvi, blogger and former concertmaster of the Seattle Symphony. He was forced out in a highly publicized to-do in which music director Gerard Schwarz claimed that Talvi had been playing badly, and Talvi acknowledged that his playing was substandard, because the orchestra administration was forcing him to use an inferior violin provided by an influential donor. Talvi felt he wasn’t being treated fairly in the press, so he started a blog to tell his side. That was some time ago, and now his blog tends to address follies elsewhere in the world, just about anyplace other than the Seattle Symphony.
    But this week he has been moved to post on the latest controversy at the orchestra:

Recently, colleagues of mine have been accused of terrorism in the workplace, according to local papers. I haven’t read the stories, but have been told about them by many of these people. They claim the accusations are false, and were purposely planted in the media with the help of reporters, who either wanted to stir trouble, help their friends or had other motivations. To an outside observer, the ‘facts’ as they supposedly have been reported, sound rather retarded and created by someone with an elementary or middle school mentality.
    OK, let’s get this straight. Talvi can’t be bothered to pick up a copy of the Seattle Times, or look at it free online, and read the actual story. Relying only on hearsay, he proceeds to denounce journalists for anything ranging from mere sloppiness to hidden agendas.
    Well, you can read the main article by following this link. If you’d prefer not to do that much research, here’s how it begins:
    Vandalism, mail tampering, a razor blade, anonymous threats — it all sounds like something out of a "Sopranos" episode.
    But it appears to be musicians, not sopranos, who have been targeting their Seattle Symphony colleagues with anonymous acts that one player calls "orchestral terrorism."
    There haven't been any injuries and the police are not involved, although the symphony's acting executive director, Mary Ann Champion, said Benaroya Hall security is working on the matter.
    She said she told symphony members at a meeting Friday about the vandalism and threats and said that "this behavior is not tolerated."
    So, first of all, therte’s a quote from the orchestra’s administrative head acknowledging that something is afoot and that internal security is investigating. Later in the story, musicians are quoted by name—not, thankfully, anonymously—about how certain cars have been keyed and razor blades have found their way into the mailboxes of musicians on the “wrong” side of the argument over whether or not to dump Schwarz. Looks to me like reporter Melinda Bagreen did her homework, and has covered both sides.
    But Talvi doesn’t know that because he hasn’t bothered to read the article. So by ranting about something he hasn’t looked into himself, merely relying on the comments of friends in the orchestra with their own ax to grind, he makes himself look like a petulant fool.
    Get this straight: You have no right to denounce something if you have no first-hand experience with it. If you think some horrible book should be removed from the school library, read the book before you call the superintendant. If you think some movie will offend your religious sensibilities, at least give the movie itself a chance to disgust you rather than rely on rumor. If you think the press is biased, look at its actual reports, then offer some examples and facts to support your position and set the record straight.
    If you are ignorant, your opinion is worthless.

Classical Music,

ZUILL BAILEY

    The Arizona Friends of Chamber Music will bring cellist Zuill Bailey to town for an Oct. 22 concert at the Leo Rich Theater downtown. Here's an article I wrote about him that appeared three years ago in Fanfare.

Zuill Bailey—A Cellist Breaking Barriers

    Zuill Bailey isn’t a real murderer; he just plays one on TV. The thirty-one-year-old cellist spends most of his time giving conventional concerts around the country and serving as artistic director of the El Paso Pro Musica Chamber Festival and Series in Texas. But people who ignore classical music may recognize him from his several appearances as an inmate in the HBO prison series Oz. Bailey took that job because it gave him a chance to play music for a new audience, if only in one-minute snippets. As for the old audience, Bailey loves to spring fresh works, new and old, on us, just in case we start to tire of the small basic cello repertoire. His debut recording with pianist Simone Dinnerstein on Delos is a good example: It opens with one of the few complete recordings of Francoeur’s Sonata in E, and continues with the Bach G-Major Cello Suite, demonstrating that Bailey can hold his own in the instrument’s core repertoire. Then come three solid pieces hovering just at the edge of familiarity: Beethoven’s Magic Flute Variations, Mendelssohn’s Variations concertantes, and Chopin’s Introduction and Polonaise. Bailey tops this off with his own transcription of Vieuxtemps’s Souvenir d’Amérique, a rather wacky set of variations on Yankee Doodle.

    Bailey has also recently recorded the brief Korngold concerto as part of ASV’s series devoted to that composer, and he has a disc coming out on STIL that mingles well-known sonatas of Brahms and Debussy with a new work by Philip Lasser. Bailey swears that he’s not just biding his time until he’s well enough known to be taken seriously in the Elgar concerto; he actually gets a kick out of all this unusual music.

    Bailey had his first run-in, literally, with the cello when he was four, racing down a hallway after a symphony concert. He decided on the spot that the shattered instrument was the sort of thing he wanted to play, and his parents, both of whom are musicians, agreed. Over the next several years, he studied with Loran Stephenson, Stephen Kates, and Joel Krosnick, graduating from the Peabody Conservatory and the Juilliard School. It was Kates who introduced him to the Francoeur sonata; Kates had picked it up from his teacher, Gregor Piatigorsky, and Bailey cites the latter’s recording of two movements of it as a tremendous inspiration to him.

    “When I first looked at the score, it just seemed like five nice, separate pieces, perfect and beautiful but in a suite format, ending with a gigue,” Bailey says. “But then I heard the Piatigorsky recording, and it’s electrifying, first this beautiful Adagio cantabile, and then an Allegro that’s fast and alive. That’s how it’s marked, Allegro vivo. So when I recorded it, I didn’t want it to sound quaint. I wanted first and foremost for people to get to know the sound of the cello through the course of this sonata. It evolves, from the Adagio cantabile, then all of a sudden, pow! You get the Allegro, then it goes back to a gavotte, then a slow song, Largo cantabile, then it gallops out in the end. I love the piece, and I think people are pleasantly surprised when they hear it.”

    Bailey has no qualms about playing this 18th-century music on a modern cello with piano accompaniment. “People go to extremes today, and they either don’t play this music at all, or they play it in a very specific style they think was appropriate for that time. I look at Francoeur a different way, and this is how I come at my Bach, too: I think you’ve got to be sincere and honest in your approach, and approach these pieces in a modern way, with vibrato, and if you have more tension in the sound you can pull and tug people more. I play Bach with feeling but sincerity, and I try not to let myself get in the way. My individuality will come through without having to hit people over the head with romanticism.”

    In the end, Bailey is an admitted sensualist. “I love beautiful sounds,” he says. “The cello is a very comforting instrument to play as well as listen to, and I just want to hear gorgeous sounds when I play music.” He’s even a bit of a hedonist, judging from his love of the Vieuxtemps Souvenir d’Amérique, a virtuoso vehicle rather than a piece of lovely music. “It’s terribly fun to play,” he says. “One of the things I love about classical music is the more you play these pieces, the more you uncover about them, even a silly piece like this. It’s meant to be a joke. Vieuxtemps came over here on his first US tour and was determined to be successful, and in the late 1800s it was a fad to take a famous theme and write variations on it. So he composed, in his Paganiniesque, Vieuxtemps way, a piece that would start off in a cadenza format and confuse the hell out of people. They’d say, ‘What is he doing?’ Once he got them in that frame of mind, he would turn to the polar opposite of seriousness, the Yankee Doodle theme. I grew up with my older sister playing pieces like this on the violin, and I’m always looking for interesting pieces to add to the cello literature in transcription format. Several years ago I had to come up with an American-themed piece and I thought it would be very funny to transcribe this. It took a little work, because I don’t have an E string, and so for that and other reasons the cello has to do things differently, chords have to be inverted, and staccatos and pizzicatos are in different places. You have to transcribe it and play it in a way that shows how a cello can shine.”

    Bailey’s own cello is a 1693 Matteo Goffriller, formerly owned by Mischa Schneider of the Budapest Quartet. As Bailey has discovered, a cello can be like a shoe that’s been worn a long time by somebody else—and this cello conformed to long-time wear by Schneider. “I can tell, based on particular notes in the bass, that this has been used as a quartet instrument to the extreme,” he says. “You can hear it in the Bach; when I hit particular notes on the C string it opens up like a pipe organ, because it adjusted itself heavily to Mischa Schneider being the core of the Budapest Quartet. And performers conform to their instruments as well. Schneider used this for at least 30 years of his career, so over time they conformed to each other. I find that this cello is pretty much as good as I am, in the sense that it magnifies what I do and I can really . . . there’s a fine line between pushing myself on it and letting it do its own thing, as opposed to some Strads I’ve tried. The Strads are glorious, but when you play one, it almost plays you because it’s pure gold. After about 30 minutes you realize, ‘I have to get used to gold, because that’s all that’s going to come out.’ I think a lot of cellists are drawn to instruments like this Matteo Goffriller because they aren’t pure gold; they have a lot of grit and growl in their sound. Cellists don’t necessarily always want to be pretty; they want to have texture and variety. When you push through on the lower register, you don’t necessarily want it to sound like a bell.

    “So my adaptation has basically been familiarizing myself with this cello. It’s extraordinarily large; it was made in 1693, and back then a lot of cellos were made as church basses. Stradivari after that redid the cello mold and made it smaller; his cellos were much easier to play, and these early guys saw his genius and started cutting their instruments down. This one was never cut down, and it’s unique because the bottom of the cello is quite large, but the top is just large enough, or small enough, that it’s easily playable. I think that it’s got a unique sound. On numerous occasions, people have come up to me and remarked that I sound so much like Mischa Schneider, not knowing I was playing his instrument. Once I was playing at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and a woman came down from one of the offices and asked what kind of cello I was playing. I told her, and she said ‘I knew it, because my desk hasn’t rumbled like that since the last time it was in here!’ I think this cello is a magnificent solo instrument because it has that unique voice. And it’s great for chamber music, because the way it’s built, if I’m playing a Haydn trio, or other lower things, I can really hold the structure of the piece together with this instrument, and then when I have a solo line that needs to come through, the cello sound really cuts through and sings.”

    Bailey is extremely personable, as you might expect of somebody whose first name pretty much rhymes with “cool” (“Zuill” is a Scots-Irish surname that shifted forward in Bailey’s family over the past few hundred years). Yet he is usually photographed in black, and he can easily assume the sinister expression of a handsome young Mafioso (you can see several shots and find other information at www.zuillbailey.com). So his casting as an inmate on Oz doesn’t seem too unlikely—except that Bailey landed the role because of his playing, not his looks. “I was doing all these solo concerts and began being approached to represent the cello in unusual ways,” he explains. “It’s always been my goal to be a cellist, but I started feeling that maybe I could bring this great music to people in ways they would be more comfortable listening to it, since people are creatures of habit and a lot of them aren’t going to break away from the TV to go to a concert. So I began accepting some of the more unusual invitations. For instance, in Baltimore I played on the soundtrack to the TV show Homicide: Life on the Streets; I did the Handel-Halvorsen Passacaglia, and some Paganini, and then I was subsequently asked to play a cellist on that HBO TV show.”

    Bailey rejects the notion that such TV gigs should be regarded as slumming. “It’s important to play this music just about anywhere I can,” he says, “because most people who hear the best classical music, even in the strangest places, will always come back to it. They’ll say, ‘Gosh, I didn’t know how great this could be!’ So I take great pride and responsibility in presenting the cello and the music that really represents the cello as a fantastic instrument anywhere I can. I try to choose things that would intrigue the lay listener as well as people who go to the concert hall every night. The TV people gave me full responsibility for the music; they’d say, ‘You’ve got 38 seconds here, one minute and 10 seconds there. Here’s what’s happening on screen; you come up with the music.’ So, knowing that you have to play something while someone is creeping through a hospital in the dark with a scalpel, what do you do? I thought Popper’s Dance of the Gnomes would be very creepy and spooky and fun. It was a great success for me, because people would ask me where they could get the music. That gets back to the Delos record, and why I put it together like I did. I wanted to intrigue anybody who saw one of those endeavors of mine, and I wanted this cello record to be accessible to them. And at the same time I wanted people who have all the cello recordings known to mankind to be intrigued by the repertoire.”

    He insists that even on Oz, his principal function is as a musician. “If you saw that show, you’d know I didn’t act,” he says, even while relishing the role. “They present me backstage at a concert, and I’m looming in the wings with my cello, getting ready to play, and the concertmaster is there, too, warming up. He must have done something to offend me, because I run up and harpoon him with my cello; I lift it up and poke the endpin through him. What a great idea! Take the concertmaster out just before showtime! So in the prison scenes they show me playing the cello senza endpin, because that was the murder weapon.” Having said all that, Bailey emphasizes, “Bringing this kind of music to unique audiences is my goal, but, while doing that, keeping it elevated and helping classical music come across in a classy way.”

    While Bailey is determined to bring music to fresh audiences, he has to take care to keep himself fresh, too. “I spend most of my year playing solo cello things,” he says. “I find myself playing the same things a lot, the warhorses, so I constantly search for and go out of my way to find works that are interesting, works that maybe upon hearing them another cellist might go out and learn himself or herself and add them to the repertoire.” He hopes that might happen with Korngold’s 1948 Cello Concerto, drawn from his score for the film Deception. “The Korngold Violin Concerto is a phenomenal piece, so once I heard that I had to look at the Cello Concerto,” he says. “It’s only 12 minutes long, and it’s really a neat, beautiful work. It’s not a huge investment in the sense that it’s short, it’s very easy listening, it takes you on a journey left and right to different places in your thoughts as a performer, and then it’s over. You don’t sit there and gasp and say, ‘I’ve got two more movements!’ It finishes perfectly.” Along with the Korngold, Bailey has a short list of concertos he’d like to be played more, by himself and his colleagues: the Ibert (with wind ensemble), the Mozart-Szell (“a transcription of a flute concerto Szell did for Feuermann, and nobody knows about it”), Herbert 2, Kabalevsky 1, and Saint-Saëns 2. Bailey describes each of these works with such terms as “gorgeous” and “fantastic” and “a great piece seldom heard.” Lest you think he’s a sucker for the obscure, Bailey is careful to proselytize just for works he can seriously vouch for; incorporating just these few concertos into the mainstream would make a tremendous difference, he believes: “If a few cellists would take a chance to play these in public, we could kick the repertoire open.”

    These concertos have all been recorded from time to time, but not the Cello Sonata of Philip Lasser, the next work with which Bailey hopes to expand the repertoire. Bailey is including it on a recital disc with music of Brahms and Debussy, and he says there’s good reason for such programming. “Philip Lasser is a wonderful composer who is of French descent, and he is heavily influenced by Debussy and Brahms,” he says. “He feels this is where his colors and thoughts evolve from. A year and a half ago, I commissioned this sonata, and upon doing that, I was then asked to record it in conjunction with the other two composers and pieces that inspired him. I’m kind of a big fan of recital discs, as the Delos record shows. I don’t necessarily want to play or hear an entire disc of Brahms. I enjoy going to recitals, where you get an interesting variety of music and you can compare things. So this is very much a recital disc, starting with the Debussy Sonata, then Lasser, and finally Brahms. Each piece has a different sound, but a common inspiration draws them together. I feel it more than I can explain it; at the opening, the Lasser Sonata evolves the same way as the Brahms E-Minor, and then it becomes Impressionistic in spots like the Debussy.”

    Bailey takes a similar approach to programming the El Paso Pro Musica Chamber Festival. “I’m a big fan of the warhorses, but I’m also a fan of exploring the works of the great composers that are underplayed,” he says. “We also have commissioned works. So I just try to take all the repertoire that’s spinning in my dreams, and the personalities coming to the festival, and then weave them together to make programs that would showcase performers, composers, and maybe some theme.”

    The cellist resists the notion that he might ever play a work, new or old, that he doesn’t particularly like or connect to, but do it for the good of the culture, or the composer, or to fill out a CD. Yet, he says that the music he doesn’t connect to this year may move him in the future. “In my maturation process, a lot of pieces I didn’t understand or take the time to understand in the past, I find them much more approachable now,” he says. “That’s teaching me to keep all the doors open and experiment with different kinds of music. I do try to push the boundaries back enough that it doesn’t stretch me too far, but enough that it keeps me reaching. It’s a difficult balance, because if you don’t understand something, you’re going to sound like you don’t understand it when you play it. So there are many pieces I practice that I don’t perform.” Bailey won’t reveal what those pieces are, except to say, “The whole study of Bach in general is endless, and it was a real leap to record even one of the suites because of the fact that every time I play the cello my Bach sounds very different. But I don’t want to put up brick walls and corner myself into never taking a stand on Bach. I kept fluctuating—Should I do it? Should I not? I’ll be more ready next week; I’ll be more ready in two years. But I can say that for the rest of my life. Then, by the time I think I’m ready, I won’t be able to play the cello anymore. There’s just a point where you have to walk onto the playing field with it and see where it sits, and stand behind wherever that is, and then move on.”

    This article originally appeared in Issue 27:2 (Nov/Dec 2003) of Fanfare Magazine.


Classical Music,

About Cue Sheet

James Reel's cranky consideration of the fine arts and public radio in Tucson and beyond.